Skip to content

How Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings Extended Cut Gave Faramir a Chance to Shine

12
Share

How Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings Extended Cut Gave Faramir a Chance to Shine

Home / How Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings Extended Cut Gave Faramir a Chance to Shine
Featured Essays The Lord of the Rings

How Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings Extended Cut Gave Faramir a Chance to Shine

By

Published on December 11, 2023

12
Share

Peter Jackson’s film adaptations of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings are wonderful. Howard Shore’s music has tremendous atmosphere, Jackson’s direction is emotionally perceptive, and the scripts (penned by Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, and Jackson himself, with Stephen Sinclair also contributing to the second film) are skillful. The performances also dazzle; Elijah Wood’s Frodo Baggins is haunted, Sean Astin taps into the sweetness of Samwise Gamgee, Andy Serkis is horrifying as Gollum, and Ian McKellen’s Gandalf is compassionate and comforting.

There are, of course, Tolkien fans who are displeased with the changes made to the original text, but I actually think most of the changes work very well, such as Eowyn (Miranda Otto) having more of a presence in the second film. (In the books, it felt like she only came into her own in The Return of the King.) The one area where I find myself most disappointed with Jackson’s take, however, is his handling of the character Faramir in the theatrical release of The Two Towers.

Tolkien’s Faramir is dignified and morally sound, and doesn’t come close to giving in to temptation for Sauron’s ring. He does show suspicion towards Frodo and Sam due to their secrecy, but eventually he discovers their goal (to take the ring to Mordor in order to destroy it) and releases them. In Jackson’s theatrical adaptation, however, Faramir (depicted by David Wenham) has a colder, threatening presence. In his very first scene, he does two things; shoots one of his enemies, and then orders Frodo and Sam to be taken prisoner. There is no discussion, no questioning. He simply takes them and the scene ends.

When he does finally question them, they find out that he is the brother of their former fellowship member, Boromir (Sean Bean), and that Boromir has died. We later see Faramir sitting in darkness and staring into the distance, but we have no idea what he’s thinking about; Jackson leaves this open to interpretation. In the middle of the night, his men discover Gollum, and Faramir threatens to kill him until Frodo hesitantly steps in. After questioning Gollum, Faramir confronts Frodo and Sam, and is seemingly intent on taking the Ring. It’s a chance, he says, for “Faramir, Captain of Gondor, to show his quality.” Without any context, this comes across as simply egotistical and a way of showcasing the Ring’s power to seduce. (In an interview with Jackson and Boyens, Jackson explains that they did this to maintain the sense of tension in the film; having Faramir ignore any temptation for the ring wouldn’t make sense for that goal, he argues.)

Faramir discovers the Ring in a screenshot from Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Image: New Line Cinema

Faramir takes them to the city of Osgiliath, which is under attack, and despite Sam and Frodo pleading with him, he still orders them taken to his father, with the message that he is sending a “mighty gift.” (An important phrase, as I’ll touch on.) After Sam’s speech about holding on to goodness in the world near the end of the film, Faramir (watching from a distance) tells Frodo that, at last, they understand one another. He releases them, even though he is warned by his men that his life will be forfeit, and that is the last we see of him in the film.

This version is the live-action Faramir that became known to the world through the cinematic release of The Two Towers. For much of the public who never watched the extended versions or read the books, it is the only Faramir that they know. This is a terrible shame because the Extended Edition version of Faramir is not only much more nuanced, but also one of the best parts of Jackson’s adaptation.

Let’s return to his very first scene, but this time looking at the Extended Edition. There is already a crucial difference on display: Sam protests that they are innocent travelers when Faramir’s men capture them, and Faramir, with the haunted look of a man always at war, observes that there are no travelers in that land, only servants of the dark tower. When Frodo sternly tells him that people who oppose “The Enemy” would do well to aid them, Faramir targets his use of ‘enemy’ immediately, as he stares at a dead man on the ground that he has just shot:

“The enemy? His sense of duty was no less than yours, I deem. You wonder what his name is, where he came from, and if he was really evil at heart… what lies or threats led him on this long march from home… if he would not rather have stayed there in peace. War will make corpses of us all.”

(This is a mildly altered version of a passage in Tolkien’s books, which originally comes from Sam’s thoughts.) In the context of the film, we see from this dialogue that Faramir is thoughtful, empathetic, and perhaps deeply tired of war. We are given moral nuance for the story as a whole, too. I have seen Sam’s original passage used during discussions over Tolkien’s handling of good and evil in The Lords of the Rings. The absence of this moment in the theatrical edition is staggering, not just for Faramir’s character, but for the moral texture of the tale itself.

Faramir and his men hold Frodo captive in a screenshot from Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Extended Edition
Image: New Line Cinema

When he reveals that he is Boromir’s brother, we are also shown how he found Boromir’s body drifting in the water, which gives us a snippet of his own perspective instead of keeping us outside it. After this we see him holding Boromir’s split horn, in a pose that will mirror one his father takes in the final film, and then we are allowed to see what he was thinking about in that moment from the theatrical edition where he was sitting in darkness. It’s a flashback sequence, entirely new and absent from Tolkien’s text and the theatrical version, which is one of the best scenes in the entire film:

Boromir stands high above the men of Gondor, triumphant and charismatic as he proclaims that they have retaken the city of Osgiliath from enemy forces, and that it will never again fall into evil hands. The mood is ecstatic, and when Boromir comes down to mix with the men, Faramir finds him and they share a warm moment where they drink together. “Remember today, little brother,” Boromir says. “Today, life is good.”

This is when their father enters; Denethor, the steward of Gondor, played by John Noble. Denethor embraces Boromir with real pride, but when Boromir points out that the victory also belongs to Faramir, Denethor is callous. It’s Faramir’s fault that Osgiliath was taken in the first place, he notes. “Always you cast a poor reflection on me.”

Boromir and Denethor move away and talk together, Boromir trying to tell Denethor that Faramir loves him, while Denethor is unimpressed. He urges Boromir to go to Rivendell and bring him the Ring, “a mighty gift,” before Boromir walks away again. Faramir overhears them when they return, and he offers to go to Rivendell instead. Denethor is distasteful at the very suggestion, and then we get dialogue from him that is crucial for Faramir:

“You? Oh, I see. A chance for Faramir, Captain of Gondor, to show his quality. I think not. I trust this mission only to your brother—the one who will not fail me.”

Faramir watches Boromir leave for Rivendell, and Boromir’s final words to him are, once again, reminding him to remember that day. His tone has changed now, though; he’s almost mournful. Always recall the warm moments and victory we had today, he is silently saying. He senses that darkness awaits in the pursuit of Isildur’s Bane, but even he doesn’t know that this will be the last time they see one another.

Faramir, Denethor, and Boromir, Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Extended Edition
Image: New Line Cinema

This is a revealing scene. It gives us more of an idea of Gondor’s history in the war, we see the actual relationship of Boromir and Faramir and the contrasting dynamics they both have with their father. It shows us Osgiliath, which is key not just to Faramir’s arc in this film, but also to his character in the next one. It gives us more context for Boromir’s actions in the first film, helps us to understand Faramir in this one, and paves the way for Denethor’s cruelty in the final film, thus covering past, present, and future. Denethor’s line where he scoffs about Faramir wanting to show his quality is particularly important because, later on, we suddenly grasp the proper context when Faramir repeats this line in front of Frodo and Sam. It’s not egotistical at all; it is a sad yearning to please his father and prove himself. That, it seems, is what the Ring is particularly preying on.

The scene near the end of the film with Faramir telling his men to deliver Frodo and Sam to Denethor also calls back to this flashback, as Faramir uses Denethor’s exact phrase to Boromir (“mighty gift”) as a message for him. Did Faramir somehow overhear that full conversation, or is this mere coincidence? Either way, it is a reminder of what is motivating him, context absent from the theatrical edition. The important thing here is that the film gives us Faramir’s perspective. While the theatrical cut observes Faramir in a detached way, keeping him mysterious and less fleshed out, the extended one captures him intimately and sympathetically.

When Faramir decides to let Frodo and Sam go, he doesn’t simply vanish from the film as in the theatrical cut. We see him showing them a way to the woods, and wishing them well, with the most important part being Sam telling Faramir that he has shown his quality — the very highest. Now that we know the struggle Faramir has endured, and why he was tempted, this line is the perfect end for his arc in the film. (Leave it to Sam to have the most touching dialogue.)

Faramir in the Extended Edition shows his “quality” as a character, you might say, and Faramir in the theatrical edition is undeniably damaged from a narrative perspective. What makes this situation more complicated is that this also has an impact on Faramir’s depiction in the final film, The Return of the King. While my focus here is The Two Towers, there is one scene that I can’t help but reference in the third film, which is the one where Denethor and Faramir are together in Gondor, and Denethor is deeply displeased that Osgiliath has once again been taken by enemies. He clearly wants Faramir to retake it, but Faramir justifiably points out that it is simply overrun, and they are at too big a disadvantage. Denethor ignores him. Faramir then slowly asks the one terrible question: Does Denethor really wish that Faramir had died instead of Boromir?

Denethor pauses, and then simply says that yes, he wishes that. Faramir, with tears in his eyes, says he will do his best to retake Osgiliath, and only asks that if he returns his father might think better of him. “That will depend on the manner of your return,” Denethor says.

Screenshot of Faramir from Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Image: New Line Cinema

It always seems to come back to Osgiliath for Faramir, doesn’t it? I wonder if, at this point, he views it as his own Waterloo. This once again shows how important the flashback scene in the extended second film was, as we saw Denethor accuse Faramir of being responsible for losing this exact location before. In a way, this scene feels like an essential sequel to that one.

This specific scene, which is thankfully in both the theatrical and extended versions of the third film, really seems to make an impact on people. It’s Wenham’s performance, his look of overwhelming hurt, and even the way he slowly walks away. Roger Ebert, who complained about what he felt was a lack of psychological depth in the films, said he only felt “truthful emotion thoughtfully paid for” twice out of all the moments in the trilogy: the endings for Faramir and Gollum. (In Faramir’s case he seems to be specifically talking about the way Denethor breaks down and attempts to burn him alive.) That twisted relationship between father and son works so well due to scenes like the one I described above, and it must surely work even better if the viewer has seen the Extended Edition of The Two Towers and the Osgiliath flashback there.

There is one thing both versions of the film Faramir, theatrical and extended, share; he seems more vulnerable, and less confident than in Tolkien’s text. Tolkien’s Faramir feels like an ideal captain; confident, wise, and morally pure. Jackson’s Faramir feels like a man trying to be a captain, endearingly so in the extended version, and mysteriously so in the theatrical. I don’t think that the fans that complain about Faramir in Jackson’s work are wrong, but they focus on the moral degradation of Tolkien’s version, while, for me, Jackson actually gave us an even more sympathetic version of Faramir but hid it in the Extended Edition. (Maybe that is fitting for a character who is supposed to have a more subtle and less visible value to him than his brother Boromir.)

Perhaps Jackson’s Faramir, even the extended cut depiction, isn’t really the same as Tolkien’s character, but I think he has, as Billy Boyd’s Pippin put it so well in the extended Return of the King, “strength of a different kind.” He’s utterly human.

 

Aamir Mehar is a freelance writer and a lifelong fan of fantasy and science fiction. You can find him on Twitter: @Aamirmwriter

About the Author

Aamir Mehar

Author

Aamir is a freelance writer and a lifelong fan of fantasy and science fiction. You can find him on Twitter: @Aamirmwriter
Learn More About Aamir
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
David Pirtle
1 year ago

I’m much more bothered by what the films did to Aragorn and Frodo than what it did to Faramir. Faramir’s great in the books, but he’s not really a major character. Plus, Tolkien himself struggled with the point in the story where the character who would become Faramir captures Frodo and Sam, trying to figure out how they would realistically be allowed to continue on with their quest. At one point in the drafts, Gollum has to rescue them. So while I don’t entirely disagree with fans who say Faramir was done dirty, I do understand why Jackson did what he did with the character.

michael_hicks
1 year ago

100% agreed, the Osgiliath flashback is so important for contextualizing Faramir’s motivation as more than one-note, and showing Boromir’s heroism as a foil (and his source of desperation that the Ring seized on).

I’m also a huge fan of the cut Saruman scene — he was arguably the main bad guy of the first two movies more than Sauron, don’t just off-screen him! — but at least the characters’ guilt from his words made sense without the scene for context. 

Avatar
cdr.bowman
1 year ago

Jackson’s concept of Faramir is effective, but it only works if the entire screenplay (with regards to his character arc) is shown. Without the additional scenes, too much is left unsaid.

Without putting to much into it, one wonders how many of Tolkien’s characters – in terms of the various “leader” protagonists and supporting characters – reflected some of the men he served with – or under – in the First World War. 

Avatar
Steffy
10 months ago
Reply to  cdr.bowman

The “You shall not pass!” statement by Gandalf was from a statement made by someone in WWI

Avatar
Corbet Action
1 year ago

I think it’s very much up to interpretation from the books and as far as the movies go it’s headcanon for me, though it’s one that originated from an article I read, but Faramir and Boromir in the books both had a dream from the Valar, I recall it being from Eru originally,  through attempts at reminding and confirming this information for myself have left me uncertain. The thing is Faramir had the dream multiple times and Boromir only once so I want to believe it was the same thing in the movies more or less, that he was the one who was meant to be a part of the Fellowship leaving Boromir as the one to defend Osgiliath, the better warrior and likely the better leader. I think the Fellowship still would have split but perhaps they all would have survived. Narratively speaking of course having a member die raises the stakes but this is more overall. The moment the author is this article is one I’ve thought through several times due to this information and makes it probably my favorite scene for both brothers in the movie. I’m no literary scholar, though I am a major Lord of the Rings fan so I do try to learn as much as I can about the original works and what Tolkien has said, but I can accept that this may not be the case, so I find it intriguing to think about this what if possibility. 

Avatar
1 year ago

Faramir coming off as a colder, ready to take the Ring at first instance person was one of the biggest things that also nagged me about the second movie (and I say it while absolutely adoring the whole trilogy). Which is why I was particularly happy with the Osgiliath flashback scene in the EE – it opened Faramir’s person and motivations so much and in the same time also gave us Boromir who was warm and loving of his brother and not yet touched by the presence of the Ring. This flashback is brilliant for all the reasons mentioned in the article (all the motivations, brother-father-son dynamics, etc.), but I also highly appreciated the other extended scenes.

The theatrical trilogy is great. The extended trilogy is simply magnificent.

Avatar
Matthew
1 year ago

I’m afraid that this doesn’t really sway me; I still feel like Jackson did Faramir dirty. It comes down to this to me:

“Alas for Boromir! It was too sore a trial!’ he said. ‘How you have increased my sorrow, you two strange wanderers from a far country, bearing the peril of Men! But you are less judges of Men than I of Halflings. We are truth-speakers, we men of Gondor. We boast seldom, and then perform, or die in the attempt. Not if I found it on the highway would I take it I said. Even if I were such a man as to desire this thing, and even though I knew not clearly what this thing was when I spoke, still I should take those words as a vow, and be held by them.

‘But I am not such a man. Or I am wise enough to know that there are some perils from which a man must flee. Sit at peace! And be comforted, Samwise. Your heart is shrewd as well as faithful. For strange though it may seem, it was safe to declare this to me. It may even help the master that you love. It shall turn to his good, if it is in my power. So be comforted. But do not even name this thing again aloud. Once is enough.”

The guy who said that wasn’t the guy in the films.

Avatar
1 year ago

The entire chapter where we meet Faramir is one of my favorites of the entire series. I couldn’t believe the movie had him about to take Frodo back to his father when the whole beauty of the scene is that he could and did NOT. He “showed his quality.” And having the soldiers of Gondor beat a bound Gollum as if they were thugs- ugh, it all made me just cringe and I’m sure it makes Tolkien fume in his grave. ( Ever read the collection of his letters? He writes about Faramir to his son Christopher.) It’s as if Jackson tried to rearrange the two brothers- making Boromir more likeable so maybe we’d mourn him more? Or he was just trying to make a cliffhanger for the end of the second movie? I really can’t understand why when there’s an awesome story already written, the filmmakers can’t just stick to it. I understand having to cut out things (like Bombadil) but changing important characters’ character- nope, can’t buy that. I hear ya DavePirtle and Matthew!

  I have the extended version but I don’t even watch past the first movie anymore. I do miss the seige of Gondor scene- that was cool. But really, if you don’t read the books, you don’t even know the true story. The Scouring of the Shire is another key chapter which for the sake of length, I can understand why it wasn’t put in but it’s the heart of the story-“orc talk” in the Shire and Gandalf telling the hobbits “it’s what you’ve been trained for.” 

Avatar
David Pirtle
1 year ago

@7. I agree that the scene where Gollum is brutilized by Faramir’s men is awful. It’s probably my second-least favorite scene in the entire trilogy of films. That moment is, in my opinion, a much bigger betrayal of the book character than his initial desire to take the Hobbits to his father. He can and does at least rectify the latter mistake.

As for why Faramir’s story was changed, I have read that Peter Jackson says he did it mainly for reasons of story structure, that he needed the Frodo and Sam story to go on longer in order to match up with how long the other stories were going on. However, I don’t entirely buy that. I think Faramir was rewritten for the same reason Aragorn was rewritten. Jackson didn’t think they were “relatable” enough. I love listening to the Tolkien Professor, Corey Olsen, rant about how he hates that word.

Avatar
emmel
1 year ago

You have no idea how happy I am to see this at tor.com. Faramir is my fave character from the books, so when I saw his transformation in the movie, I fumed. I understand that Jackson did this to build tension in the second film for Frodo and Sam, particularly since Shelob was moved to the third movie. But Tolkien clearly shows how Faramir can resist (easily) the thing that captured and destroyed his brother. Boromir is all outward glamor and prowess, while Faramir is inward and adaptable. But the movie removes that element from Faramir, and I was seriously peeved over that.

What’s interesting is that Eowyn is in many ways like Boromir: more for action than contemplation, seeking glory and affirmation. It’s only as she evolves that she can match Faramir, who ends up with someone reflecting facets of the relationship with a beloved brother who is now gone from his life. It’s a nice bit of closing the circle to my mind. 

While the extended edition of the third movie improves the relationship between Faramir and Eowyn (which was frankly zero in the theatrical cut), I wish there had been more to show how their connection evolved in the Houses of Healing. I understand that they also shot the wedding but never put it in either edition. I’m praying that one of the anniversary releases will share that one da

Avatar
1 year ago

Hah! I’m catching up on old Tor articles and I was just gushing about Faramir on a different post (the male role models one) and here we are!  I also enjoyed his line (which I do think is also in the books) about loving the sword only for that which it defends.  He’s not in it for glory or a love of violence.

My friend and I were so mad at that scene in The Two Towers we almost walked out.  I get all the arguments about ‘tension’ and ‘relatability’ but they just don’t work for me, in part because it just feels like it’s denying that people can be good people and still be relatable.  Part of stories is to show us things like that, and what virtue looks like and how it can be exercised. 

But I do agree the extended editions go a long way in showing us some of Faramir’s struggles and vulnerability even if the book doesn’t make that as explicit. The tension with his father was there, just not dwelled on as much.

@9 yes so much!  Their scene together talking (and kissing) on the wall of the Houses of Healing is such a sweet, heartfelt scene (in a book that really doesn’t have a lot of romance) and I would have loved to have seen it more fleshed out.  I did notice they show Eowyn in the blue cloak he gave her but they never really mention it.

Avatar
Steve Morrison
1 year ago

@10: Yes, the line is in the book. Faramir says to Frodo:

War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend: the city of the Men of Númenor; and I would have her loved for her memory, her ancientry, her beauty, and her present wisdom.

Re the other thread, you seem to have nominated Faramir for much the same reasons I did.